agenthropic

Due-Diligence Dossier — Claude Code Agent-Observability Dashboards

⚠️ SUPERSEDED (2026-07-04, banner added 2026-07-06). The evidence and grades in this dossier remain valid and citable. The recommendation (fork simple10; graft cast analytics.ts) is superseded: the project is a greenfield clean build per ../analysis/best-path-decision.md, and cast/disler/nirdiamant code is clean-room-only per CD-9. Current entry point: ../analysis/PROJECT-STATE-2026-07-06.md.

What this is: an independent, source-level audit of the six candidate dashboards evaluated for agenthropic, plus a meta-audit of the two vendor “Technical Due-Diligence” reports (v1, v2.0 extended) that recommended one of them.

Bottom line: the vendor panel’s own scoring model ranks simple10 first, then overrides itself to recommend hoangsonww on a tie-break that rests on a factual error. Corrected, the recommendation flips. My independent grades diverge systematically from the panel: it over-rated the flashy-but-fragile and under-rated the disciplined.

Status: analysis only. No adopt/fork/build action has been taken. The direction decision waits on Ivan.

How to read this dossier

File What’s in it
methodology.md How the audit was run, sources, tools, limits, the verified GitHub fact base
report-meta-audit.md The panel’s self-contradiction, the fact-check table, the weighted scoring model dissected
market-landscape.md Selection bias — the popular tools the panel never mentioned — and the real market gap
security.md Cross-cutting security reality (0.0.0.0, no-op auth, RCE, SSRF) + Mac Mini hardening checklist
recommendation.md The decision, its rationale, the step plan, alternatives, and open questions
projects/simple10.md A− — my pick as base
projects/hoangsonww.md B− — study, don’t adopt blind
projects/cast.md C — two ideas worth stealing, else lock-in
projects/disler.md C− — teaching example, no tests, no license
projects/nirdiamant.md C+ — wrong shape (flat feed)
projects/claude-code-templates.md The 28.4k★ tool the panel missed — the baseline to differentiate against

A one-page executive synthesis also lives at ../independent-due-diligence.md.

Grades at a glance

Project (owner) Panel v1 Panel v2 (/5) Independent Move
simple10/agents-observe B+ 4.1 (highest) A− ▲
hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor A− 4.0 B− ▼
ek33450505/claude-code-dashboard (CAST) B− 3.8 C ▼
disler/…observability B+ 2.7 C− ▼▼
NirDiamant/claude-watch C+ 2.6 C+ =
davila7/claude-code-templates (missed) — — C (for this need) new

The recommendation in one sentence

Fork simple10, harden it (127.0.0.1 + token + launchd, no Docker), then graft hoangsonww’s Telegram webhook provider and cast’s delegation-savings metric — with hoangsonww kept cloned only as a reference for its richer D3 graph. Full rationale in recommendation.md.


All figures verified at source on 2026-07-03. These repos move fast — re-verify before any final commitment.